top of page

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 523, April 07, 2006

INSTITUTING THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT


WHEREAS, Article III, Section 16 of the Constitution guarantees the right of all persons to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasi-judicial or administrative bodies;


WHEREAS, Republic Act No. 9285, otherwise known as the 鄭lternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Act of 2004?, declares that it is the policy of the State to actively promote and encourage the use of ADR as an important means to achieve speedy and impartial justice and to declog court dockets;


WHEREAS, the use of the alternative modes of dispute resolution has proven to be effective in amicably and speedily resolving disputes filed before judicial and quasi-judicial agencies;


WHEREAS, there is a need to promote the use of ADR to achieve speedy resolution of all disputes before all administrative bodies in the Executive Department.


NOW, THEREFORE, I, GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO , President of the Philippines, by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, do hereby order:



Section 1. Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution. All administrative bodies shall promote the use of alternative modes of dispute resolution such as, but not limited to, mediation, conciliation and arbitration as part of their practice in resolving disputes filed before them.



Section 2. Training. All agencies of the Executive Department shall train in the field of ADR at least two (2) senior officials who shall be designated to organize, develop and implement the use of ADR in their agency.



Section 3. Management of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Executive Agencies. The Office of the President shall manage the development of the

ADR practice in the executive agencies. It shall:


coordinate/direct the development of rules, regulation and procedures to implement ADR policies in each agency;


assist in providing training resources for the development of the use of ADR in each agency;


3.3 monitor and evaluate the compliance with and efficiency of the use of ADR in each agency;


educate and encourage the public in the use of ADR;


perform such other functions as may be necessary to carry into effect the purpose of this order.


Section 4. Principles to Promote Just and Efficient Administrative Dispute Resolution.


4.1 All executive agencies are mandated to review periodically their administrative dispute resolution processes and develop specific procedures to reduce delay in decision-making, to institutionalize the use of ADR processes prior to litigation, to facilitate self-representation, and expand non-lawyer counseling and representation where appropriate;


All executive agencies shall review their administrative dispute resolution processes that may create or induce prejudice on the part of the decision-makers that may result in injustice to persons who appear before administrative dispute resolution bodies; regularly train all fact-finders, administrative hearing officers, and other decision makers to eliminate such prejudice; and establish appropriate mechanisms to receive and resolve complaints of such prejudice from persons who appear before administrative dispute resolution bodies;


An agency may propose the enactment of new laws to minimize litigation so as not unduly burden the courts. The agency痴 proposed legislation and regulations shall provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard, and shall promote simplification and burden reduction.


Section 5. Funding. Funding for managing ADR programs shall be included in the yearly appropriations of each agency.


Section 6. Transitory Provision. Until the general policies and implementing rules and guidelines are issued by the Joint Congressional Oversight Committee, all existing ADR policies in administrative bodies, if any, shall continue to be in full force and effect. Nothing in this order shall be construed to require any administrative body to act in a manner contrary to any existing laws, rules, or regulations.


Section 7. Separability Clause. If any provision of this Executive Order is declared invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions not affected thereby shall continue to be in full force and effect.


Section 8. Effectivity. This Executive Order shall take effect immediately.


DONE in the City of Manila, this 7th day of April, in the year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Six.


(SGD.) GLORIA MACAPAGAL-ARROYO


By the President:


(SGD.) EDUARDO R. ERMITA

Executive Secretary

Recent Posts

See All
EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 190, November 05, 2015

MODIFYING THE MOST-FAVOURED-NATION (MFN) RATES OF DUTY ON CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS UNDER THE TARIFF AND CUSTOMS CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES (TCCP), AS AMENDED, IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE PHILIPPINE TA

 
 
 
EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 191, November 05, 2015

MODIFYING THE RATES OF DUTY ON CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 851 (S. 2009) IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE PHILIPPINES' ASEAN-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND FREE TRADE AREA (AANZFTA) TARIFF

 
 
 
EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 192, November 12, 2015

TRANSFERRING THE REGULATION AND SUPERVISION OVER HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO THE INSURANCE COMMISSION, DIRECTING THE IMPLEMENTATION THEREOF AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

 
 
 

Comments


+63 927 310 7646

54 National Highway

San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte

2901 Philippines

Stay informed, join our newsletter

Thank you. You will now receive our updates. If you wish to have access to our Library, go to Plans and Pricing.

bottom of page